Playing Indian and Idealizing the Peasant in Ivan Bunin’s “Nocturnal Conversation”
Posted By Eagle Owl on May 1, 2012
Ivan Bunin entered the Russian literary arena with a plethora of writings about Russian peasantry. One of the stories published in 1911 is “А Nocturnal Conversation” (Ночной разговор). The son of a wealthy landowner, a boy in his early teens who attends a gymnasium, is infatuated with the rugged ways of local peasants who work for his parents. One summer he decided not to engage in bookish learning to achieve self-improvement, but instead to “study the common folk” (изучить народ). Described as an “irresistible passion for peasant oafs” (страстное увлечение мужиками), the boy’s interest in peasant ways lead him to work the land side by side with them and to imitate their cavalier roughness with respect to local girls. After having rubbed shoulders with them for the whole summer, the boy adopted their “sudden, awkward but firm reasoning, ready-made cookie-cutter wisdom, rudeness and good-naturedness, fitness for work and laziness” – all those qualities that set them aside from “bookish oafs.” He was ready to celebrate the success of his summer-long expedition into the Russian soul when a night conversation with several peasants revealed to him the shocking truth of their past cruelties to people and farm animals. One peasant shot and stabbed to death a Georgian prisoner-of-war, another one killed a man in a bar fight and watched how other peasants scalped and eviscerated the body, while the third one took part in a grim act of skinning of a live bull. Unrepented and terrifying in their “Mongolian calmness,” the peasants dispelled overnight the idealistic picture of a primitive rural culture that the boy had been building in his mind.
It’s remarkable that, as part of his initial description of the gymnasium boy’s life, Bunin mentions that he “played redmen” in the winter. “Playing Indian” seems to have been a quite popular entertainment among Russian boys at the turn of the 19th century. Dmitri Ulyanov reported that his younger brother, Vladimir (later Lenin, born in 1870) used to play Indian. Anton Chekhov focuses on this dramatic outdoor pastime in his story “Boys” (Мальчики) (1887), Alexander Serafimovich documents a boy’s attempt to escape to America from the “joyless and painful gymnasium days” after having read Mayne Reid and Cooper in “Escape to America” (1898). I documented these literary instances of the “playing Indian” theme in “Playing and Nothing” (2006). What Bunin adds to these mentions is an unusual context. If in Chekhov and Serafimovich, playing Indian is a revolt against dumbifying formal schooling, in Bunin playing Indian is lumped together with the boy’s inauthentic, childish, bookish, passive winter life that he tries to overcome by getting close with local peasants during the summer. Playing Indians, dreaming about the African adventures of David Livingstone, reading about unknown geographies and high passions of self-sacrifice was part of childhood, working next to peasants and idealizing them was a step into adulthood. When physical exhaustion undermined his will, the boy’s winter life would beckon him back. Finally, it triumphed over his summer life when he became disenchanted with the peasants. The boy was trying to enter psychological maturity – to follow on his physiological maturation enabled by his sexual encounter with “a widow” arranged by one of the peasants – by breaking free from book-induced developmental paralysis, but he couldn’t yet handle gruesome realities. Once faced with the peasants’ savagery, his desire for authenticity reveals its origin in the world against which it revolted. One of the peasants refuses to accept him as one of his kind by calling him “Moscow wimp.”
Fascination with peasants was an important part of the late-19th century populist political movement in Russia. Known as “going to the country folk” (хождение в народ), the movement affected a segment of the young, urban Russian intelligentsia. In the period between early 1860s, when serfdom was abolished, and the 1910s before Russia plunged into World War I and the Bolshevik Revolution, enthusiastic young people from St. Petersburg, Moscow, Kiev and other major cities began escaping to villages and small rural towns. They found work as doctors and teachers, tried to keep their ear close to the needs of the Russian peasantry, learned peasant ways and spread the word of an imminent socialist revolution among the rural poor. Many of these narodniki felt partiality toward peasants since childhood, and as they matured, this interest in what they thought of as the “pure Russian soul” and the “autonomous Russian way” developed into a full-blown ideological movement, an important flanker to the industrial socialism advocated by mainstream Bolsheviks. Interestingly enough, this Russian kind of peasant populism is reminiscent of the fascination with American Indians in the U.S., which, as Philip Deloria (Playing Indian, 1998) showed, was an intrinsic part of the young American nation’s search for national identity. Just like Indian imagery in the U.S. and Western Europe fell into two contrasting templates – noble savagery and ignoble savagery (see Berkhofer R. F. The White Man’s Indian: Images of the American Indian from Columbus to the Present. New York, 1978) – so did the images of peasants in Russia. The boy in Bunin’s “Nocturnal Conversation” tasted both of them.





